![free gay videos interupted free gay videos interupted](https://adabgmwwup.cloudimg.io/v7/_queerty-prodweb_/2019/09/shutterstock_1180139380.jpg)
So for all that is raging around, it is just not right unless you go right to the coalface. Chris Rogers is with me, but Chris, far more importantly, the women who work in the cricket media who are directly affected by this. So as we gather for the Press Room it is the single topic up for debate.
Free gay videos interupted full#
Gerard Whateley: I don't think until you hear in its entirety you get that full context. Read the full transcript of their chat on The Press Room, during a rain-interrupted day three of the third Test between Australia and the West Indies, below. It’s always easier to look at the world black and white than it is to see the color of diversity.Following Chris Gayle's widely criticised interview with Channel Ten's Mel McLaughlin, Grandstand's Gerard Whateley spoke to Fox Sports' Neroli Meadows and ESPNCricinfo's Melinda Farrell. It’s why guys like Shapiro stand on stages or hide behind podcasts, there’s no one to delve more into nuances of their stances. Just listen to what they say and parse it apart and their argument crumbles. The right is self contradictory in nature. So the question begs of Ben to answer what about people who, thru no fault of their own, were born with a different set of genetics? Do they not qualify as human? How do you qualify what they are? Or do you accept what they choose to identify as b/c it realistically does not matter in anyway? There are people who have genes that aren’t all neatly XX or XY either and that is a fundamental, scientifically proven, fact. Fine, does that mean it includes a uterus? B/c if yes, then are women who have had hysterectomies no longer women? And if no, then what is fundamentally the difference b/t a woman and a transgender woman? Let’s assume he’s thinking of a woman with a vagina.
![free gay videos interupted free gay videos interupted](https://cdn.dmcl.biz/media/image/201523/o/GettyImages-1231928904+(1).jpg)
He doesn’t realize it, of course, but in the categories he lists as ways to define it does indeed open up the possibility of transgender people being legitimately recognized as the gender they identify as b/c even those categories aren’t as simply cut and dry as he believes. In that second video posted in this article, even Shapiro’s own description on how, or should I say what, makes a man a man and a woman a woman opens up the possibility of transgenderism. cPppHsmXGUĭoes Ben Shapiro think “you’re wrong” is an argument? You can’t just cut them off before they give an actual reason, Ben! That’s not what an argument is!Īlso, are these stage-hands actually just censoring this dude cause he said Ben’s definition of ‘wokeness’ was wrong? /OEmKAYxDelĮlsewhere in the presentation, Shapiro denied the existence of trans and nonbinary people, saying, “A man cannot be a woman and a woman cannot be a man. Just going to leave this definition from Cambridge here, just in case anyone is unsure, as I was, what they’re specifically talking about, and why Shapiro is wrong. I used to go to school with guys like Ben - intelligent people who thought they were far more intelligent than anyone else and that their views, no matter how fallacious, were automatically absolutely right because they were their views. Which Shapiro doesn’t really get in his home DIY studio.
![free gay videos interupted free gay videos interupted](https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/cms/asset/b95fd461-ae06-4bf8-9514-c0072196648a/gr1.jpg)
This image is what Ben Shapiro’s version of “free speech” looks like at one his own shows.Ī staffer putting their hand over the microphone of a perfectly polite questioner challenging him in real time. I want to bash my head through a plate-glass window and bleed out on the shards listening to him for more than 9 seconds. I will never understand how there are people who go out of their way to listen to this guy speak. The greatest trick Ben Shapiro ever pulled was convincing the world he was some sort of intellectual. “This is going in weird directions” is a funny way to say “Harvard didn’t prepare me for legitimate arguments.” But underneath it all there’s just a vacuum.” “It’s a trick that works only when he’s not scrutinized. “Ben Shapiro’s entire persona is built on speaking with miraged authority,” Campbell said in a follow-up tweet. In two minutes, all of Ben Shapiro's 'anti-woke' tirades are just destroyed.